RE:RE:RE:So, just how big is the stockpile??Well....given you don't bother to "take the time" before would profess to speak the truth, and correct everyone else on the BB - perhaps you should take the time - and then post the correct information.
I for one, did add up the total depth drilled across all holes..
I for one, did estimate the actual square meter coverage based on a "scale drawing" provided by the company.
I for one know that 25,000 is ULTRA conservative, and for you to say "could actually be much smaller", is almost...yes...almost...illegal....
so your "what I think happened" is OPINION - and not even "informed" opinion, as you "have not taken time to actually calculate out the drilling"
WOW @Givemeabreak1....
I am so so glad you finally admitted that....
givemeabreak1 wrote: Gamble
This is from their September 2019 news release. Note it is long time before they ever drilled the stockpile. I have not taken time to actually calculate out the drilling but I suspect they took the airborne which extended the width and length of the stockpile from 2019 then multiplies it at the drill average actual depth to arrive at the 25000 which should be fairly accurate. That said, if the airborne increase in dimension has overestimated give the actual manual on ground estimate the stockpile could actually be much smaller than the 25,000. I think though it is pretty accurate. I think what happened is what they originally saw as the stockpile was much smaller hence nearer to center which as a hill works deeper on all sides. As you move farther out ie greater dimension the depth goes way down which is what I think happened.