RE:RE:RE:We lost 1/2 our share price since launch..I think the problem is NR's are not stand alone documents. They leave out details that should be reiterated instead of relying on readers being aware of all past disclosures. In the March NR about the R+F launch there were no details on how Sirona was to benefit. Readers probably assumed a standard licensing arrangement was in place. It is only later that readers became aware of the lousy deal Sirona has with R+F that expectations were dampened and the share price retreated.
forhandlaren wrote: I beg to somewhat differ - the initial decline from 56 cents was because of bozo german investors that expected R+F news at CET time in the morning. Disappointed of not getting any NR they started to sell.
Nevertheless, the management is not hungry enough to nail deals in time, they like to recognize themselves as victims of the game but could and should step up. Howard wants the partner to be happy and that nice, but I deem that he is way to soft to play the game. The partners find him weak instead of bold and proud. This results in lame deals. I would love to stand corrected!