RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Corporate PresentationSo you are assuming that it adds 0.5-1 mil cash flow BEFORE paying the 0-1 mil payout. That is OK, aside from the fact it makes us very leveraged with debt and extremely vulnerable to an econmic downturn. And there will be no immediate benefit to bottom line for several years, as any extra cashflow benefit would be used to pay for the acquisition.
If you are telling me they make that much additional cash flow AFTER making a 1 mil yearly payout, that is massively bullish. The difference is immense, as we would literally pay down debt within a few years.
All I am saying is that it would be nice for some clarification, as the difference in those two scenarios is absolutely massive from a balance sheet perspective.