RE:RE:Don't forget about the flumed silica I'm happy someone brought this up. It mentioned something about 2 years but that seems to be just related to the grant funding. Separately, in an interview with Bernard, if I understood correctly, he commented that fumed silica was actually the furthest-along process and that the next step would be straight to building a pilot plant. This is what they are working on advancing now and we should see a press release about this sometime in the near future along with a new related joint venture arrangement (perhaps a similar arrangement as the HPQ Nano subsidiary).
Exciting times.
ScienceFirst wrote: Unclewrong ... Calm down. And stop your wishful thinking. This fumed silica project and the funding that came with it is for a period of 2y, as per Peter.
And for the tunneling project, Peter also mentioned not to expect anything in the nearby future. It was initially intented for electric lines (Tunneling for underground power and pipelines), as per the Arcbyt patent. Could this become a larger scope, good chances, but we have no data.
What's interesting though is that we have many irons on the fire, in all our vertical markets. That will bring steady growth and that's what matters.