RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Tinley is getting wall floweredI'm still good with two of them just not EAT. I should have cashed in when it hit the dollar mark which was about a 25 bagger for me but I flew too close to the sun. NU is about half of its high and I am still above water with TNY. I am going to hang on to them because I think I see dollars and not cents for their future. I did sell most of my BLO when it spiked up 50% in one day which turned out to be a good move. I still hold 5k shares of it because I see 10 dollar bills for it with a working thc breathalyzer.
Could Jeff have pulled this off quicker? I doubt it or the guys with the big bucks would already be licensed up and on shelves in California.
Clearly there is fear or commonsense for some of these players to not touch the product for fear of Fed action, especially for non US companies. One of the proposals on the floor for a US triggering event clearly defined protectionism for US companies over non- US companies.
Tinley has done pretty well in California navigating the legalities to get thc infused products on shelves and the Becketts happened pretty quickly in the US and Canada, so the slow going for expansion is understandable. Possibly anticipating some changes at the Federal level to allow Interstate transfer of products from central production plants.
Some American investors aren't waiting to be a part of the greenrush and some US MSOs are doing very well building cannabinoid companies as allowed/where allowed and protected by State laws.
glta and dyodd