Soley relying on assumptions is always dangerousTake the POC for example, were you informed that it was conducted to singularly witness the comparative performance of spectrum slicing in specified comparative testing to the existing standard, or did you choose to just assume this? What are the chances the DCW software was included in non divulged performance testing? Considering that billions have already been invested in the current standard, maybe the Tier 1 was looking for specific evidence as to exactly where that single road ends and the multi lane highway will start. Now, is it save to assume they might have attained the specific information they were looking for? It might be worth the wait. Can leo provide the answer to this question or does he expect we will rely on his thoughts?