Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nevada Copper Corp NEVDQ

Nevada Copper Corp is a Canada-based mining company. The Company is engaged in the development, operation, and exploration of its copper project (the Project) at its Pumpkin Hollow Property (the Property) in Western Nevada, United States of America. Its two fully permitted projects include the high-grade Underground Mine and processing facility, which is undergoing a restart of operations, and a large-scale open pit PFS stage project. The Property is located in northwestern Nevada and consists of approximately 24,300 acres of contiguous mineral rights including approximately 10,800 acres of owned private land and leased patented claims. Pumpkin Hollow is located approximately 8 miles southeast of the small town of Yerington, Nevada in Lyon County, one- and one-half hours drive southeast of Reno. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is Nevada Copper, Inc.


GREY:NEVDQ - Post by User

Comment by Notgnuon Jun 21, 2021 5:25pm
122 Views
Post# 33424566

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Puszy paper exiting before 10:1 = Good buying time

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Puszy paper exiting before 10:1 = Good buying timeIt comes down to how you do the accounting. If you do not, in your own valuation, capitalise the ineffeciency into the cost of mine building for the future full run rate cash flow then yes, you can argue lower cash flow. Point is that even if part of the ore is delayed from getting to the surface and the mill, the workers and machines are still working underground and building access to the other stopes etc. Those costs just end up being pre-payments against future costs (thus capitalized) in my way of creating a valuation model.

N

Fishbillion wrote: Previously did snots..... its simply not...


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>