OTCPK:ICPVF - Post by User
Comment by
lashingon Jun 24, 2021 3:51pm
196 Views
Post# 33445482
RE:RE:RE:RE:Deal sweetener
RE:RE:RE:RE:Deal sweetenerThey dont care unless its obvious and they are forced to care. Regulators exist to help their friends not us.I've not once seen an investigation started, done right and prosecuted that was their own doing as a regulator. Its because they had to or more common, because a big fish used them to harrass a small fish. This is one and possibly the only benifit to Brookfield, they are a big fish with lots of sway in regulator land.
Maxmoe wrote: What does it matter? I doubt the ASC, the OSC, or the SEC would ever say , "no that's too much info, we don't need any more than the statutory minimum disclosure on any topic, ever". They are entitled to whatever information that THEY think is relevant, not what bip's slick lawyers think is required. Sorry.
bttmfischer wrote: Do you think that disclosing the number of IPL shares held by Brookfield is relevant to the subject matter of the hearing by the ASC?