RE:RE:RE:Supply agreements are legally binding!Hello Savyinvestor333.
You suggestied that JimmyBly1 would be incurring a greater expense to buy back a position at today's prices. I have a good sense that JimmyBly1 has been yanking your chain, so to speak.
If JB1 was out on the sidelines during the month of September 2020, I don't expect JimmyBly1 was on the sidelines watching for too long. Surely JB1 would have understood what was afoot immediately following the Techmer PM, LLC deal having been announced. ultimately though, suggesting the share price is 'expensive' is subjective. If Jimmy Bly1 bought at today's high and the share price climbs well beyond the $5 to $7 dollar markers before yet another share price propelling development is announced by GRA.V management; would you think today's share price expensive?
I've experienced this kind of occurrence plenty of times previously, i.e. once all the weak retail hands are on the sidelines after having booked what would be a relatively small profit, Institutional investors simply keep accumulating sizable positions in preparation for the second and third leg upward.
You and I both know that institutional investors would have extrapolated the most recent figures supporting a requisite and coming 'revaluation' of NanoXplore's enterprise value; and institutional investors have a much better idea of just how high the GRA.V share price can be made go from current price points.
Should retail investors not have known it then; they certainly know it now., i.e. GRA.V had been 'a sleeper', so to speak. Everything is going to move much more quickly now; and you won't have to worry about new developments being disseminated in a timely manner.
This is going to be quite the ride.
I believe the following BTO song lyrics can sum it up nicely.
You ain't seen nothing yet B-b-b-baby you just ain't seen n-n-n-nothin' yet Here's somethin' that you're never gonna forget B-b-b-baby you just ain't seen n-n-n-nothing yet