RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Supply agreements are legally binding!Did you ever think that maybe it is replaceing another additive and that the end cost is very similar? Do the math on $1 per cubic metre and tell me what our revenues would be then.
JimmyBly1 wrote:
What I am saying bored j1 is that graphene will not solve the crazy CO2 emissions of concrete industry, this is green BS for city investors driving a Tesla. Was talking about engineered concrete vs regular one, even though both are big in numbers:: as you rightly said, its a major commodity. Question so: how do you sell a $10 per kg technological magical whatsoever powder into that? A ton of concrete is worth between $50 to $200 I know that its public data. Explain and do make the maths work or gtfo You are saying "volumes" and ratios etc to trigger production output. Yeah but top-line price of finished products is key not bottom line cost of the raw ones or additives at some point. This way not the other way round unless crazy tech benefits which is not the case here to justify a higher pricing for a super commodity. JimmyB