RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:This is all about confidence...So a little math, there were 7 tests left outstanding. They made it to at least 30 positive and 30 negative, meaning only 3 tests could have been incorrect. At worst the sensitivity or specificity would be 30/33 or about 91%, so both would be between 91% to 100%. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Rainmaker11 wrote: "The ongoing clinical study for our AcuVid™ COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Saliva Test has performed extremely well," expressed Therma's CEO Rob Fia. "As of June 16th, 63 subjects were enrolled and provided a nasal swab for a RT-PCR test and a saliva sample for the AcuVid™ test. Of the 63, RT-PCR results were received for 56 subjects, with 28 positive and 28 negative results. The RT-PCR results for the other 7 subjects will be received in the coming days. The AcuVid™ test demonstrated a 100% specificity for the RT-PCR negative samples. Of the 28 positive RT-PCR results, the AcuVid™ test had a 100% sensitivity for RT-PCR results with a Ct values below 27." It says it clear on the news from 8 days ago