RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Radio Interview - Blah, Blah, Blah...So, you felt like you had to respond, searched the net and that is what you came up with? Dude, that is pretty lame. Ok, now you are either plain stupid or a guy with an agenda. Your Samsung example is nothing but a test kit that takes an hour and relies on a static sample. "The disposable virus sampling/monitoring kit developed by the team is similar to the pregnancy test kit, and enables completion of both sampling and diagnosing on airborne viruses within 50 minutes on-site (10 to 30 minutes of sampling and 20 minutes of diagnosis) without requiring a separate cleaning or separation process." It is not automated nor does it provide networked notification. Again, you are either thick as molasses or as dishonest as any other basher here.
There is no comparison between this , and continous real time monitoring. One thing some of us here who are long have been frustrated by is a sense that the public has yet to understand the significance of what CEMSI have done. You clearly do not (or pretend not to). But nobody is going to read your post and think you are on to something. I'm done calling you candypants... that was me being nice. You sugar britches have become transparent.
Something true... the world has wanted this technology and research has been ongoing. And then CEMSI, with great experience already in environmental monitoring simply took what existed, repurposed and automated it and created a whole new patentable process. That is the stock we own shirt head. Good luck convincing folks otherwise.