RE:RE:RE:Group 11 at LD Micro-InvitationalKind of funny that ETi's in-situ process is an iodine based process ( clearly stated last Group 11 presentation) , with their own little tweaks on the formula. Just google iodine-iodide based extraction of gold from ewaste etc. and papers written by institutes on experimentation confirm results. Intellectual property is a funny thing. Pepsi-sugar, caffeine colour and flavour. Coke- sugar, caffeine ,colouring and their own flavouring. I guess if one isn't truly identical to the other it is okay. I think that the lawsuit is total B.S, against MIneworx.I think arrogance is involved not being center in the spotlight. Many shareholders including myself feel that the ball has been dropped big-time. Jabil walked away, Yamana was on their website for conventional mining, ( no longer) One of their head chemists walked a little over a year ago. Oh and let us not forget the statement of working with Apple for extraction of tin for , was it 6 months? Oh, and after all those months of commercial testing with Jabil, all of a sudden the Surrey plant is too small to do over 3600 tpa? All I've heard for the last several years, is we are in negotiations, and for strategic reasons we can't divulge. Judging by the lack of volume since these last two latest exciting announcements, no volume or share-price appreciation. That says it all. Time for the ceo to buy some more at 60 cents and then sell over 80. I hold and am a very frustrated investor. I hold much more Mineworx and it was refreshing that they actuall named a partner and actual feedstock supplier for catatlytic converters. One out of two isn't bad. glta