RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Patient #16, #17 & #18Hey Hey! 100-110? Even better Cr %s numbers. ;-) Yeah Halt isn't the right word as the Phase 2 would transition to commercialization. Where insurance companies would then be paying for the study, along with TLT, instead of TLT paying for all of it.
Eoganacht wrote: I don't think they will halt the trial until they treat all 100-110 patients. If they get accelerated approval from the FDA one of the conditions of approval would likely be finishing the trial.
Rumpl3StiltSkin wrote: I'm guessing they'll keep treating patients in the US and Canada until they get these efficacy %s up where they want them, then they can halt phase 2. Around 40 or so patients? :-)
enriquesuave wrote: Even if they get 5 on 8 that would be great plus the 2 from PH1, that would be like 7 out 10 patients who got optimized procedure. That would confirm a high efficacy for the market to understand what's going on here. All IMHO
StevenBirch wrote: Don't you guys think we should wait for the next update, less than a month, before assuming that no more US patients have been treated? I understand the frustration but it is obvious now that the AGM was not going to reveal anything that we didn't already know.
Besides, and maybe I missed it previously but I thought they needed a minimum of 25 treated and now it seems like 20 - 25 so we are already there. Now only 8 have been treated with the optimized procedure but what if they go 7 for 8? Finding that out isn't that far away.
It can be depressing seeing the frustration here but isn't there something between $0.25 and an eventual buyout? Shouldn't we see a significant bounce within weeks or months if the results are what we expect?