Nailbiter1 wrote: The reason given for the new change of direction was because of unforeseen complications.
The large employer groups questioned what would happen if some of their people got elevated scores. Would they be satisfied with the answer "that's on you"?.
"We did our part. Thanks for buying the test and good luck with those results. Buhbye now, call again".
Now we offer full service from detection to treatment. From monitoring regression/progression of the disease to future tests to make sure the cancer remains at bay.
Second, we've seen what happened to Grail and Illumina's attempt to buy it back.
The FTC saw it as a domination play and that is no good for trading.
Squashing the competition is not favorable to the FTC.
We offer diversity. We make money, healthcare makes money, hospitals make money under the virtual direction of our new Care Oncology team. Everybody get a piece of the pie
and the Federal Trade Commission loves that and will not drag us, kicking and screaming to court.
I'm not full of $hit.
I'm 40% water, 30% vodka and only 30% $hit.
cactuseskimo wrote: Than tell us why Nails, they made such a big deal about this fact at the launch of Aristotle - acting like it was a big revelation, which is why they needed to have their own clinic? If this was such a known fact of doing business, why did they not anticipate this problem sooner and instead wait until the last moment? And furthermore, how come people such as yourself didn't seem to mention this problem or be aware of it until after the launch of Aristotle and Care Oncology? You act like this was obvious the whole time, but no one on this board mentioned the upcoming problem prior to the release of Aristotle. You're full of $hit man.
Nailbiter1 wrote:
Liked2Think wrote: Why colonsentry and breastsentry didnt require oncologists and a program for when positives are detected but Aristotle does?
They make a big todo about saying cancer is not like covid and you need proper channels set up for cancer testing yet they never had any of that before now they suddenly need it?
Is it one specific form of cancer that makes this a criteria?
Is this the reason the previous tests didnt make money?
or is it just another load of bs?
Looks like this Care buyout is the only direction to move in for them so i guess it doesnt matter. would be nice to know just how much we are lied to. Shoudl we add this to the list of "fibs" or is it actually fact.
All tests have always had to be ordered from your doctor. This is not new, this has always been.
If you spent a fraction of your time actually doing some research instead of crying in public, you would know this.
Please read from our website...
If a patient receives an elevated BreastSentry score, physicians and patients may wish to proceed with informed decision making to assess whether to pursue further screening such as breast MRI, ultrasound, or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Also, you would know that even though BreastSentry shares its name with ColonSentry, it is not our test. It belongs to Germany's Sphigotec.