RE:RE:RE:RE:good interview gives forward looking statementsNothing , nor any answer , is good enugh for u is it fruit .
B sur to show up at the webinar and ask Pscal why .
I note he has engaged
mining engineers , not bull board posters named tsloppy , poke , tannin , or fruit . fruitvale3067 wrote: I see the gentleman asked my question about why the bulk sample was scheduled for Barry and now isn't. Pascals answer started off with "Different Management" different ideas. Then moved to they did one in 2008 or 10. Then moved to cost of the road repair, then finally said they decided to drill instead. He was all over the map.
First, the bulk sample done on Barry back them was from an open pit, not the underground which is the plan to mine Barry going forward. So that excuse is rubbish. Second here is an article (below) that explains the inportance of doing bulk samples.
https://investingnews.com/innspired/gold-exploration-bulk-sampling-methods-yukon/ The article discusses bulk sampling vs drilling and how bulk sampling is much more important than drilling. Which leads me back to why MTO walked away from Barry over a decade ago and have decided to move barry to the back burner. It's not as economically viable as Moroy and Gladiator. Think about it Barry has the most reserves of any of the three deposits yet management has decided to drill instead of do a bulk sample and better understand the deposit. I think that pretty much says it all. They need to find considerably higher grade, thicker veins, spaced more closely together to make Barry economical.