Question for those complaining aboutthose of us who complain about the substandard efforts, or in some cases just the substandard results, of TH regarding marketing the stock to investors.
Since the complainers about the complainers seem to come from the scientific arena, I thought this question might help you understand where we are coming from on the business/investing side of the equation.
What would you think if TH produced great scientific results but refused to publish them or speak at conferences about them? Or what if they presented at conferences and published their work in scientific journals but their presentations were much weaker than what you had become accustomed to from others using the same venues? I imagine you would think that to be foolish and would be quite frustrated by the company missing out on getting the notoriety their work deserved.
For us on the investment side of the equation, it seems equally foolish to not fully inform the various types of investors who are constantly on the lookout for stocks with intriguing and potentially very profitable opportunities. OR to try to do so but continuously fail to pull it off when so many other companies seem to be having very little difficulty doing the same thing with worse fundamentals and business outlooks.
Does that help explain our frustration??