RE:RE:RE:Here's your update...Iseevalue wrote: Dividend increase is very logical. Or at the very least a $0.01 special dividend would be a logical solution. $0.01 / share would be $1.05 million dollars... it would be a 5.2% instant dividend yield compared to the $0.19 share price
Double digit the dividend to 10% and let all the new traders entering the game have their stock screeners pick them up. If they doubled the dividend and paid $0.0025/ quarter instead of the $0.00125 they do now that would be very fair.
Roger holds a lot of shares so dividend increase would help a lot
eventually the dividend yield either rewards shareholders by forcing price up and putting yield % back in proper line or if share price remains low in relation to NAV dividend helps alleviate the burn of low share price.
I would rather see dividend payments increased then too much spent on marketing. Mathematically long term the little tiny things like that truly add up. Quiet dividend payments and share accumulation through the form of a drip will prove powerful with this stock if the dividend plan is changed.
Name change is a must at this point.
I'm a bit on the fence re: dividend
Ordinarily a growth Company (or a Co looking for growth opportunities), shouldn't have to attract investors looking for a dividend. In theory, the growth opportunities that present should yeild a higher ROI (for investors, as long as the SP reflects the underlying growth in NAV). Also, it's a long way from a $ 36M portfolio to a $ 100M one, especially if profits are paid out in dividends vs re-invested.
Having said that, a dividend would at least give some comfort (consolation) to those disturbed by the lack of progress in closing the gap between the SP and the NAV/sh.
So splitting the difference and popping the dividend up to 5% at 20cent, might just help it to get over the 20 cent wall.
MM