RE:RE:RE:RE:Financial and others The search for a partner is just a positive spin on the fact that the program is parked, shelved, whatever you want to call it. Until something different happens. We really are in Hail Mary territory if it's relying on finding a partner, basically they can't get the market to finance this. I think you should think of this program as inactive until we get news to the contrary.
"None futility" is just the recognition that they don't have anything to guide them on where the Ph3 endpoints will land. The Ph2 data set is incomplete. It's clearly more impactful that this is coming from the mouth of one of the regulators.
So they are going to do nothing until something happens. What this program clearly needs is to dose more patients and get the right data from those patients. I don't understand now that what they've been chasing has clearly hit an unpassable roadblock (unless a partner turns up) why don't they just commit to a smaller trial with the intention of getting a answer to the none futility issue, it wouldn't be 400 patients. I guess they don't want to tie the program to that trial for the next 2 years maybe that's not commercial viable either.
This program needs more data, it needs to dose more patients and that seems to be the one thing the company will not commit to atm.
palinc2000 wrote: I guess end of May was still in pandemic country which could explain sales,,,,
Could the search for partners have been delayed till the interim futility analysis ( 400 patients)
If there is no efficacy then the trial would presumably be stopped and t he costs till then would be lower than was originally expected,,,,
scarlet1967 wrote: On oncology reading between lines the trial is progressing well. On NASH they have completed the negotiations with both agencies and have EMA onboard. They need now to do an interim futility analysis on 400 of total 1100 patients for 18 months (75 to 100 HIV), post approval will include additional 1800 patients. So my take is the EMA wanted that interim analysis included in the trial process and the total patients increased for phase 3 from 900 to 1100 and post approval from 1100 to 1800 patients resulting in more costly trial. As a result the company would like to find a partner for the program. That would be the ideal situation not only it brings resources/credibility but de-risk the program. This could delay the launch of the trial.
They have about still 57 millions which is a positive surprise. The sales were not great but let's see what they have to say about sales going forward.
As predicted NASH is very much on the table and EMA is onboard, the reason for futility analysis might be to to get more biopsy confirmed fibrosis patients and most likely to convince EMA to accept their harmonized protocol.
The good stuff is EMA is onboard, they will looking to partner up for NASH, oncology is progressing well and they seem to have same amount of cash now as end of February. The bad stuff is more costly NASH and not unexpected less sales.
"Our Phase 1 clinical trial of TH1902 for the treatment of sortilin-expressing cancers progressed as planned during the quarter and we believe that we have developed a targeted peptide-drug conjugate that may potentially transform the way cancer is treated".
palinc2000 wrote: Disappointing sales and change of plans im Nash -start of Phase 3 Trial delayed and THTX looking for a partner in Nash due to higher Phase 3 costs