Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

American Creek Resources Ltd V.AMK

Alternate Symbol(s):  ACKRF

American Creek Resources Ltd. is a Canada-based junior mineral exploration company, which is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties, principally for precious metal deposits. The Company’s projects include Treaty Creek and Austruck-Bonanza. The Treaty Creek Project covers approximately 114 square km in the Skeena Mining District of northern British Columbia and is situated approximately 70 km north of Stewart. The Austruck-Bonanza Property is located within the Kamloops Mining Division 53 kilometers north-west of the city of Kamloops in south central British Columbia. The Austruck-Bonanza Property is underlain by Devonian to Triassic Harper Ranch formation comprised of fine grade sedimentary rocks including mudstone and shale and includes basaltic volcanics. The Company holds 100% interest in the Austruck-Bonanza Property and 20% interest in the Treaty Creek project.


TSXV:AMK - Post by User

Comment by CharlieWaffleson Jul 19, 2021 9:39am
337 Views
Post# 33568509

RE:AMK Stockhouse article

RE:AMK Stockhouse articleCurrent per OZ
 
           Cost_OZ
AMK         $15.72
TUO         $22.17
TUD          $25.72
 
If you use the average of $81 per OZ and divide by OZ in reserves to see how many OZ you would get if you paid full price you get.
 
                       @_$81oz           "Free_OZ"        
AMK               1,060,330          4,401,670        4.2X
TUO               1,494,662          3,967,338         2.7X
TUD                5,202,227          1,183,773       2.1X
 
When I bought AMK I assumed $100 per OZ and the MCAP was in the 17-20M which means I had paid full pop for 200Koz (245Koz @$81). That's 27X increase from my starting point. Now if the TC gods look favorably on me :) I would be ecstatic if say in 2 years more of the same but reserves double, now that would be something.
 
A doubling in reserves from now as a starting point would look like this.
 
                       @_$81oz   "Free_OZ"        
AMK               1,060,330          9,863,670         9.3X
TUO               1,494,662          9,429,338         6.3X
TUD               5,202,227          27,569,773       5.3X
 
In these comparisons something obvious needs to be pointed out. AMK is currently uniquely different in that AMK is 100% TC. For that reason, AMK is my anchor and starting point.
 
Consider this. If you subtract MCAP for AMK to TUO and TUD you get in Millions
 
             MCAP No_TC
AMK      $86     
TUO      $121     $35
TUD      $140     $164
 
TUD here is 1/3 MCAP No_TC is ((MCAP/3)-AMK_MCAP)*3
The spread between what the cost for all assets excluding TC for TUO and TUD looks rather extreme.
 
Now with TUD doing a spinout this will be much easier to do. I would say that once you get 2 100% TC plays trading that will be fun to watch. Keep in mind that once this happens TUD “has to” trade at a discount to AMK. Why do I say this? Well if markets are efficient they will know that AMK has $0 cost going forward, TUD..... not so much. Could be some fun trades.
 
On a side note, if you take the cost per OZ for AMK and apply it to TUD reserves and completely exclude their related costs it would trade with a MCAP of about 257M and NewCo 164M. Discount costs will be easy to know as the quarterlies are released. Basically, AMK you do nothing and TUD MCAP you subtract 1 full year of all expenses. From here you would see how closely they trade on a per OZ cost basis.
 
It’s nice to see TUD join AMK in doing a spinout. This means between both we just got a boost in exploration activity over last year and 2022 could be even greater. Perhaps I should start tracking how many Meters were drilled in total last year between all 3 and start tallying this year’s drilling.
 
As an example, excluding TUO and can’t remember if any drilling was done on Dunwell 2019-2020?

2019 TUD drilled 9,782M and AMK =0M
 can’t find “official” number best was their own estimate
2020 TUD drilled 20,000M and AMK =0M

2021?
 
TUD says about 50,000M and if you got STNG and hold it current tally is 3,882M
 
Now again I’m not sure about TUD 2020 but if correct this year you get 2X more drilling than the combined last 2 years.
 
What I would really like to know from TUD is to confirm 2020 Drilling total and how much does the last 2 years of drilling make up of total Reserves? Thinking out loud but how much drilling is needed to move reserves into M&I? Say that’s 20,000M, leaves 30,000 which is past 2 years total?
 
I’m thinking 2 years to double reserves (my reference point) but if they hit more of the same and last 2 years drilling makes up 50% then 2021 would add approx. 15M OZ and if it made up 100% it goes to 54M OZ. The variables need some refining that’s too large a range. If last 2 years drilling make 100% resources, then drilling is more of the same hits with min 30,000M drilled per year gives total 82M OZ. I can’t say I can actually see 82M OZ seems lofty.
 
I think I have to workout the last part a little more :)

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>