RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:SU is a VERY, VERY undervalued stock...My opinion is that you posted a nonsensical post...SU is undervalued because...Joe Manchin
Please elaborate how you feel that guardian article about Joe Manchin means SU is in your words a "VERY, VERY undervalued stock"
ilvmyt5s wrote: Why do I need to answer your questions? You haven't given your opinion on my post. Perhaps you don't understand? Chris007 wrote: LOL..why is it so hard to just answer the question? why the ambiguity?
ilvmyt5s wrote: feel free to read my history...enjoy ;p Chris007 wrote: Well, please enlighten us...
ilvmyt5s wrote: lol the irony is that it's not. it's a VERY simple concept. Simple concepts can be VERY confusing...
Chris007 wrote: SU is a very, very unvalued stock, because....Joe Manchin?
Definitely some serious, hard hitting analysis right there...
ilvmyt5s wrote: SU is a VERY, VERY undervalued stock...
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jul/20/joe-manchin-big-oil-democratic-senator?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other