Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Canada Carbon Inc V.CCB

Alternate Symbol(s):  BRUZF

Canada Carbon Inc. is a Canada-based junior natural resource company focused on the acquisition and exploration of natural resource properties. It holds a 100% interest in two graphite properties located in Quebec: The Miller Graphite Project and Asbury Graphite Project. The Miller Graphite Property is located in Grenville Sur la Rouge, Quebec. The Miller hydrothermal lump-vein historical graphite mine and surrounding property cover approximately 100 square kilometers (km2) and is located 80 kilometers (km) west of Montreal in the Grenville Township. The Asbury Graphite Project is made up of two claims for a total of 119 hectares (ha). It is located 8.1km northeast of Notre-Dame-Du-Laus in the Laurentides Region of southern Quebec.


TSXV:CCB - Post by User

Comment by BobGreenfieldon Jul 24, 2021 2:43pm
169 Views
Post# 33601110

RE:Setback for an open pit mine- Journal de Montreal

RE:Setback for an open pit mine- Journal de Montreal
What setback? The company is moving ahead on the feasibility study as they always planned to do. CPTAQ has given the company approval to carry out the work that was always required for the feasibility study and it just happens that the same work now approved will address everything CPTAQ would like to see in order to give final approval for mine and quarry development.

It's true that the company had an aggressive timeline initially but the work required is the work required so you can't really call any of this a setback.

Zealots can spin things any way they would like but the Miller project advances and a mine will be developed at that site.

GSLR has no standing to do work on the property as noted by CPTAQ so the onous is entirely on GSLR  to communicate with the company if they would like to be involved in the next steps. The company has stated over and over that they are willing to work together so if GSLR has preferences they had better make that call to the company because CPTAQ has made it more than clear this doesn't have to be the case.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>