Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Corazon Mining Ltd T.CZN


Primary Symbol: CRZNF

Corazon Mining Limited is an Australia-based mineral resource and exploration company. The Company is an explorer advancing the Lynn Lake Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Sulfide Project in Manitoba, Canada, as well as the Mt Gilmore cobalt-copper-gold (Mt Gilmore) and Miriam nickel Sulfide projects (Miriam) in Australia. The Lynn Lake Nickel-Copper-Cobalt Sulfide Project is a significant Class-1 nickel resource. The Mt Gilmore Project is located 35 kilometers from the city of Grafton in north-eastern New South Wales. The Company owns an 80% interest in Mt Gilmore. Mt Gilmore is focused on multiple rare, cobalt-rich sulfide deposits, similar to Cobalt Ridge. The Miriam comprises five Prospecting License applications (P15/6135 to P15/6139 inclusive) and is located approximately 10 kilometers south-southwest of Coolgardie on an ultramafic trend, which hosts Auroch Minerals’ Miriam and Nepean Nickel Deposits.


OTCPK:CRZNF - Post by User

Comment by minedrilleron Jul 26, 2021 12:08pm
117 Views
Post# 33604551

RE:RE:RE:No replies from Investor relations

RE:RE:RE:No replies from Investor relationsYou’re still not getting it. This is not a game or an academic exercise and it’s not a foregone conclusion.

In response to your three points:

- A nonresponse to emails could be surmised in a number of ways from a legal perspective. If you're relying on a nonresponse as a paper trail then that's a shakey start for you (not a good starting point IMO).

- Neither do I, that is why I want a credible and logical answer to my question. It’s the most logical way to go IMO. By not acknowledging the crux and urgency of the problem you lose straight away and hence you can't address it head on. Again, your reliance on asking questions is laudable in a sense but they’re merely rhetorical if they’re not acknowledged. If you don't even get a brief reply a year and a half after the onset of Covid then your alarm bells should be ringing. Relying on a non-responsive paper trail is going to need good legal representation (shall we say). Not saying it’s not winnable but it just makes the end result somewhat more difficult. A better and productive perspective would be to acknowledge the fact that they have moved on psychologically and we as established retail shareholders are being frozen out while NZC are still listed on the TSX. This listing has terms and conditions which could be used for the next step. We as shareholders are being treating appallingly while NZC are effectively scamming (and that’s what it is) new potential retails; for what? Greed? Ego?
Well ergo we have to now accept reality and start thinking in a different way. If there is no response in my mind there is only one rational conclusion. All other questions are void as they don't address the fundamental query of trust; hence they're puerile avoidant navel gazing.

- Again your final sentence unfortunately reveals the level of your disconnect and confusion. Hedge funds do not do fairness. That is my deep concern, that is the reality, that is what you have to accept and that is where we are at this point. 

Finally, you seem to be more fatalistic and subservient to a situation which is now being largely managed by RCF and not NZC. I’m not, there is legal routes shareholders can go which could and would seriously get int the way of RCFs plans. But “again” the problem has to recognised first for what it is and then we go from there. To emphasise the urgency of our predicament, apart from their radio silence the fact there is officially one final share offering just before a potential major financial injection which coincidentally (buhaha) makes RCF the largest shareholder was IMO the ploy along. Again everything from the board demography to their non-responsive strategy to the numbers are a problem for guess who? Not Mr Mc Donald and not RCF. If that doesn't make alarm bells ring then you really need to check into planet real.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>