Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Reconnaissance Energy (Africa) Ltd V.RECO

Alternate Symbol(s):  RECAF | V.RECO.WT | RCNWF

Reconnaissance Energy Africa Ltd. is a Canada-based oil and gas company. The Company is engaged in the exploration of the Damara Fold Belt and Kavango Rift Basin in the Kalahari Desert of northeastern Namibia and northwestern Botswana. The Company holds interest in a petroleum exploration license no. 0073 (PEL 73) in northeast Namibia and an interest in petroleum exploration rights in northwest Botswana over the Kavango Sedimentary Basin. The Company's exploration license covers an area of approximately 25,341.33 square kilometers (km2) (6.3 million acres) of oil and/or gas exploration properties comprising Blocks 1719, 1720, 1721, 1819, 1820 and 1821 situated in the Kavango Basin of northeast Namibia (the Namibia Licensed Property) and approximately 7,592 km2 (1.88 million acres) in Botswana (the Botswana Licensed Property). The two licenses together comprise over 32,933 km2 (8 million acres).


TSXV:RECO - Post by User

Comment by TurnToTheRighton Jul 28, 2021 3:52pm
285 Views
Post# 33617875

RE:Oil Flow

RE:Oil FlowThe Permian has had (and to some
extent still has) a substantial amount of conventional oil production. Fracing has simply allowed different formations, which they always knew contained hydrocarbons, to be economically produced when the lack of permeability (in the shales i.e. the wolfcamp formation) prevented production under primary production (no fracing or EOR) techniques.

The logs and cores will determine if fracing will be necessary. I will say, that conventional
fields can frac to increase production (like the Viking formation in Saskatchewan around kindersley), but that will likely be determined during the appraisal portion of field development. There are also different formation stimulation techniques that increase production and don't carry the same negative connotation as fracing, like acidizing carbonate formations (which one of the news releases indicated they found). Time will tell.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>