Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nevada Copper Corp NEVDQ

Nevada Copper Corp is a Canada-based mining company. The Company is engaged in the development, operation, and exploration of its copper project (the Project) at its Pumpkin Hollow Property (the Property) in Western Nevada, United States of America. Its two fully permitted projects include the high-grade Underground Mine and processing facility, which is undergoing a restart of operations, and a large-scale open pit PFS stage project. The Property is located in northwestern Nevada and consists of approximately 24,300 acres of contiguous mineral rights including approximately 10,800 acres of owned private land and leased patented claims. Pumpkin Hollow is located approximately 8 miles southeast of the small town of Yerington, Nevada in Lyon County, one- and one-half hours drive southeast of Reno. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is Nevada Copper, Inc.


GREY:NEVDQ - Post by User

Post by rockhound3on Jul 29, 2021 10:37am
164 Views
Post# 33620698

Fish: Thanks for your insight.

Fish: Thanks for your insight.

I was trying to make the point that the value of the PH property is not being reflected in the share price of NCU.

There can be many reason for the difference between the true FMV and the share price, and as you have noted debt/ cash availability is one of them.

However I was thinking back to a PHd thesis of the 1960's where a candidate was trying to develop a stock valuation model and even after taking all of the measurable #'s into consideration there was still a very large unknown which was referred to as EXPECTATION.

I think most would agree that the RISK/REWARD in the mining sector likely results in a much larger unknown EXPECTATION  factor. However in the case of NCU I suspect we have a NEGATIVE expectation at work with the value of the property not being reflected in the current share price.
 

My comment is that if NCU were put up for sale that the price realized would be 3 to 5+ times higher than the current share trading price.

Fish while I think in the mining industry financial. Statements ( including notes)can assist -the fact is that given that financial statements are based on BOOK (sunk costs) as opposed to FMV means that one has to do a lot more than read the notes to the statements to understand the situation.

Thus my hope that PALA puts NCU up for sale!

Fish-please let me know if this note helps explain my thoughts.

tx 

ROCK

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>