Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Theratechnologies Inc T.TH

Alternate Symbol(s):  THTX

Theratechnologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of therapies addressing unmet medical needs. It markets prescription products for people with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) in the United States. The Company's research pipeline focuses on specialized therapies addressing unmet medical needs in HIV, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and oncology. Its medicines include Trogarzo and EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection). Trogarzo (ibalizumab-uiyk) injection is a long-acting monoclonal antibody which binds to domain 2 of the CD4 T cell receptors. EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection) is approved in the United States for the reduction of excess abdominal fat in people with HIV who have lipodystrophy. Its portfolio includes Phase I clinical trial of sudocetaxel zendusortide (TH1902), a novel peptide-drug conjugate (PDC), in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.


TSX:TH - Post by User

Comment by scarlet1967on Jul 29, 2021 12:08pm
103 Views
Post# 33623484

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Downgraded to 3, from 8…. With everything going on?!?

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Downgraded to 3, from 8…. With everything going on?!?I don't understand you, not long ago you said the futility analysis which was something you always wanted is not commercially justified based on 25% extra cost?? Now you are questioning why that extra cost tipped the company over to partnership idea..
qwerty22 wrote:

If he'd asked them more bluntly

Q1 How did we get here because for 12 months you've been represently a thtx-led Ph3?

Q2 What are the chances of a deal? Any interest yet?

Both reasonable questions.

Let's just unpick what the company want us to believe in it's most basic form.

1) Nash is a potential multi billion dollar asset.
2) Their program shows strong potential for success.
3) A 25% rise in costs (10-40 mil??) is stopping them moving forward internally.

That seems to be what they are selling and what you are buying. In that scenario they shouldn't be searching for a partner they should be looking for the cash. Honestly they are passing up a blockbuster drug for the sake of 10's of million of dollars? It doesn't add up.

He is right to wonder how we ended up with the decision to not move forward alone, 25% increased costs does not come close to a rational explanation, it has to be much more than that.

He is right to wonder about the chances of unlocking value with a partner. It's a significant challenge.

NASH really was the only big commercial development in that CC. 

 

scarlet1967 wrote:

 

 

Below is his questions re NASH, did he asked anything about the protocol itself? No

Did he asked any questions re sales? No

So the analyst isn’t interested to understand the prospects of NASH or sales going forward? He isn’t Intrested in oncology!

All he was asking about was related to funding the protocol, partnership etc.

Then we have another analyst who hasn’t acknowledged they have started the oncology trial.

This is what happens when you put all your efforts to support the valuation by the help of these journalists.

 

“Hi, good morning guys. So I wanted to understand, so I know that we just got the protocol now approved, I guess, officially, but we've known since roughly almost a year ago now that you were not going to be allowed or the agency was not going to be receptive to you looking at only NASH patients that had HIV. So I'm just trying to understand now that you're -- now that you're deciding to partner and your cash balance is what it is, which is going to drive the decision, but we already kind of knew what your cash balance was then too, so just what's changed between since last year and now with regards to your decision to look for a partner for the Phase 3 NASH?

 

Thanks, that was helpful. And I guess the second part to that is just with regards to the modeling this. I mean, obviously this could go -- this can take many different forms as you mentioned. But of the six Phase 3, six companies running Phase 3 right now for NASH they're all in this alone. And just wanted to know on that side, have you already guys have -- have you already had people having accessed the data on a confidential basis showing interest or is this kind of an effort that's now that you have a busy [ph] guy on Board, is this something that's just now starting new from scratch?”





<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>