RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Peer Reviewed Papers on TA?
metalhead666 wrote: Articles are not academic scientific statistically valid studies that PROVE the "CLAIMS" There are indeed thousands of idiots who CLAIM all kinds of tea leaf reading ability.....Show me a definitive scientific peer reviewed study that PROVES ANY CLAIM...
Then tell me why everyone doesn't use it, why my smart phone doesn't have an app to auto trade my account to glory, why the market has yet to discount this magical thing and why you and everyone else isn't rich because of it.
Thousands of articles in academic journals. Listen. I have a doctorate. I teach masters and doctoral level courses. I know what a peer reviewed paper is. You can mock all you want. All you are doing is destroying your own reputation.
I expect almost all of us here are in this company based upon the fundamentals and what we know of the story abs prospects. The latter of which does not show up in typical fundamental analysis. To truly invest you have to know all the numbers but also mgmt, business plan, and more.