Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

West High Yield (W.H.Y) Resources Ltd V.WHY

Alternate Symbol(s):  WHYRF

West High Yield (WHY) Resources Ltd is a Canada-based junior mining exploration and development company. The Company is focused on acquiring, exploring, and developing mineral resource properties in Canada. Its primary objective is to develop its Record Ridge critical mineral (magnesium, silica, and nickel) deposit using green processing techniques to minimize waste and CO2 emissions. The Company’s Record Ridge critical mineral deposit located 10 kilometers southwest of Rossland, British Columbia has approximately 10.6 million tonnes of contained magnesium. The Company retains 100% of the mineral rights to the Record Ridge Property, which consists of 29 contiguous mineral claims, eight crown-granted claims, and one privately owned claim totaling 8,972 hectares. The known magnesium mineralization is located within two of the mineral claims. The infrastructure for the proposed development of the Record Ridge Property is located on mineral tenures controlled by the Company.


TSXV:WHY - Post by User

Comment by dmacdon Jul 29, 2021 1:29pm
250 Views
Post# 33623934

RE:RE:Maybe not so great ?

RE:RE:Maybe not so great ?The company would have consulted the exchange and obtain approval prior to news release. The  exchange should have halted the stock pending due diligence but chose to. When the offer fell through the exchange investigated to ensure no wrong doing, The buyer who ought to have been investigated.

Your post is irrelevant ... old news. LOL. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>