RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Peer Reviewed Papers on TA?Cognition777 wrote: You don't follow a system, and then you explained your system. strange...
It's like demanding that I prove TA using certain criteria; such criteria that you don't apply to your own system. Or like demanding exacititudes from me to prove TA, meanwhile excusing your own system with "likelihoods" (not "probabilities" mind you).
Regarding your method and your criteria ... Produce one professor. Waiting...
Hey Cog, I'm sure you're a well intentioned person but it's about time to stop this back and forth. I'd rather not put you on ignore for that reason but it's becoming unreadable at this point.