Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kontrol Technologies Corp N.KNR

Alternate Symbol(s):  KNRLF

Kontrol Technologies Corp. is a provider of energy management, continuous air quality and emission solutions to commercial and industrial consumers. It delivers building intelligence through the Internet of things (IoT), software and cloud technology as well as project integration. Its smart technology is deployed to customers through a cloud-based interface accessible on desktops and mobile devices. It collects real-time and historical data using IoT sensors and direct connection to industrial control systems, bringing various sources of asset performance data into the cloud where smart-learning software is applied to optimize performance. The Company, through CEM Specialties Inc., offers turn-key emission monitoring equipment, integration design, manufacturing, service, repairs, and on-site performance certification testing. It offers building heating, ventilation, and air conditioning integration, automation and retrofits to enhance the energy efficiency of buildings and facilities.


NEO:KNR - Post by User

Comment by canyousayiiion Aug 03, 2021 8:43am
64 Views
Post# 33641473

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:canyousayiii

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:canyousayiiiEdcando, not gonna let you off easy. In your subsequent posts you are explaining yourself as having read incorrectly cubic meters as square meters because you did not have your glasses. You rate your math skills as "excellent", "pretty much always beyond reproach" and in another post as "exemplary". You continued to mock my lecturing until the end as I fruitlessly tried to explain to you the concepts of volumes and areas. The post below was proof that I was wrong, and you called me a dips#it. Without your glasses (excuse you used), you convinced yourself that there is nothing wrong with a calculator saying that 160 cubic meters is 360 square feet and then 1,000 square feet is 90 cubic meters, or that 1 cubic meter = 1 square foot and the same converter saying 5 cubic meters = 5 square feet. And in another post you say you do research so you don't appear ignorant. Clearly your math and logical skills suck, but you could be fantastic at converting square meters into square feet, which apparently constitutes the subject of "math" for which you so highly regard yourself. And you end up the discussion by saying that you usually enjoy my posts but now say I am starting to sound like JF...meanwhile for months you had accused me as having a bunch of aliases and being JF/Pointer. You embarrassed yourself with public school level math and in the end you tried to dig yourself out of the hole by further blatant BS. Your math sucks, your logical deduction sucks, you do no research on anything, your judgment sucks, and you lack a much-needed filter before you post stuff. This was unnecessarily time consuming and I feel thoroughly embarrassed for you because you quadrupled down on being wrong on simple math while pumping your chest how great you are at math, which in your mind constitutes knowing how to convert meters into feet and vice-versa, up to 2 dimensions. Doubt that you learned something, but it was worth wrapping it up nicely. Have a better day.
Edcando wrote: Actually my math is excellent .  And here's your calculator d#ps!t (him not you over road lol). First put 160 into the cubic meter spot and you'll get just over 317 sq feet. But then when you clear the fields and start woth 1000 sq feet it shows up as just over 90 cubic meters). Second link is showing where they say 1 cubic meter converts to 1 sq meter. . I don't work with cubic  but my math is pretty much always beyond reproach . As we all know 1 square meter converts to 10.764 square feet (sq meters and square feet is something I'm doing daily with my construction business )

https://www.endmemo.com/cconvert/m3ft2.php

https://convertwizard.com/convert-cubic_meters-to-square_meters







<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>