RE:RE:RE:UEXCF finishes the day VTR1000 wrote: Ask that question to mango, quacks, greenie and the rest of the PUMPERS on this board, because PUMPERS never put THEIR money in.
The answer to your question, yes unfortunately, and I will get out when the time is right. But after that bad deal that may never happen.
All right. PUMPERS (mango, greeny), are you invested or you just trying to mislead everyone. And why do you seem to only preach on this board?
I get you, it's a hard space psychologically. I've heard preaching back to 2016 that price increases were imminent (Rick Rule's favourite time frame is 2 years, and it always seems it is 2 more years no matter at what point he's saying these things). Instead the market is moving like a snail and companies keep diluting at low prices which is admittedly pretty frustrating (not that I think they have much other choice).
And this:
https://www.eia.gov/uranium/marketing/pdf/umar2020.pdf
tells me the US utilities are still well supplied. But perhaps the suppliers themselves are not so much any more. And maybe - eventually, the existing deficits would make utilities start anticipating the future deficits and start buying.
If you're invested, I'd suggest, to do your best and invest in a way that it doesn't drive you crazy psychologically. I mean even if you make good money but your hair gets gray, it's probably still not worth your health.
On another note: why do you think the UEX deal is bad? Clearly it's not as good as what initially advertised, but would you have preferred all of it go to Denison?