Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Canadian Critical Minerals Inc V.CCMI

Alternate Symbol(s):  RIINF

Canadian Critical Minerals Inc. is a Canada-based mining company primarily focused on two near-term copper production assets in Canada. The Company’s main asset is the 100% owned Bull River Mine project (>135 million lbs of copper) near Cranbrook, British Columbia, which has a Mineral Resource containing copper, gold and silver. It also owns a 30% interest in the Thierry Mine project (>1.3 billion lbs of copper) near Pickle Lake, Ontario, which has a Mineral Resource containing copper, nickel, silver, palladium, platinum and gold. The Thierry Project is a past-producing copper and nickel mine located approximately 15 kilometers (km) west of Pickle Lake, Ontario. The property is approximately 4,700 hectares in size and contains a NI 43-101 mineral resource. Its subsidiaries include Bull River Mineral Corporation, Gallowai Metal Mining Corporation, Grand Mineral Corporation, and Stanfield Mining Group of Canada Ltd.


TSXV:CCMI - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Aug 09, 2021 10:12pm
158 Views
Post# 33676567

Junior X - 100/million tonnes of Cu @ 0.25% ?

Junior X - 100/million tonnes of Cu @ 0.25% ?How would Braveheart compare with a peer boasting
-  100 million tonnes @ 0.25% copper ?

Braveheart has a good
2.6 million tonnes of Copper Eq  -2.4% grade with a cut off - 1%
Hidtorical - tech reports - only speaking of copper - run the resource size as high as
5 - 8  million tonnes.

Let's crunch some numbers -
How many 0.3% tonnes would equate to 1 tonne of bravehearts 2.4% copper E1 ?

    2.4
~ 0.25
= 9.6 x factor

Now let's decduct 9.6 x (  times )  from Junior X's - 100/million tonnes
= 10.4 million tonnes

Well now... Bravehearts Historical resource sizes were - 5 - 8 million tonnes.
While Junior X's is now 10.4 tonnes.

Proves a smaller richer grade resource can compete with the larger copper deposits
based on higher grades and the best part - richer grade resource doesn't have to process
100 million tonnes of low grade ores...lol

If a junior has a smaller sized resource tonnage
but has higher grades achances are - they could compete with other larger resources

Junior simply has to take it to the next level
convert the copper to a higher end use product - it would place the junior at a higher valued status ( profits )  than a larger miner who only produces a - concentrate.

Whichis why... smaller deposits with richer grades should be modelled in a differentr fashion - modelled with an end use product - that fetches far higher profits -

If cobalite is present -  then, check the cores and stockpile above grade and brinf sdhareholders the fullest value - why dismiss this vritical step - when shipped  concentrates  might harbor significant values of other valued minerals. I shuddrr the tohughts of cobalt remained in a concentrate ore that was never factored in for profits. Hnece, sending out raw ores, allows to omuch room for another to profit - injuring the junior and provice and country.

Imagine how many other minerals are with in B.C. concentrates from all other junoors - being shipped out of country using just a 25% concentrate ?  Hello.

Cobalite + Carbon Black =  should be sought out.
                                                  especially when 900/g of cobalt was found in a = rock chip.



As mentioned - introducing an anodizxing or electrowinning - or converting the copper sulphides to = copper hydroxide for fungixice application would certainly ramp up the profits.


Don't kid yourslef...
The recent climate changes has made a complete cluter |( f ) out of crops around the world which is now experiencing - fungi issues.

Copper hydroxide is quite easy to make from copper sulphide.
Simple introduction of salts whereas a reaction occurs to bond the copper sulphate to salts.
Which becomes menable to crops and soils.

Copper hydroxide fetches a good - 6,000 7,000 usd. ( per tonne )
Not to drag this subject through the mud.. .but, my goodness, what an easy way to 
expound on a decent sized rich copper grade resource -

It's one thing to promote an Ev revolution - but -  such won't happen if the food supplies are affected worldwide -

Which is why it's not such a bad idea -
allotting a copper resource devoted to combat - fungi's.
Even better, if the copper was kept with in B.C. and made into a copper hydroxide.
 

More Food Shortages?
Phytophthora Fungus Infects Vegetable Gardens Across the Country


What is Phytophthora?

P. capsici blight, unfortunately, has hit pumpkins early and hard this year, endangering the supply of commercially canned pure as well as jack ‘o lanterns. “Home gardeners may also see it affect their ability to grow tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, and squash.” [source] P. capsici: infects pumpkins and other cucurbits, bell peppers, and eggplant.

Phytophthora, classified as oomycetes, is a fungal genus with 170 described species and another 100-500 estimated waiting for discovery. Phytophthora is one of the water molds, and not one species is up to any good in garden or field.



COPPER = AGRICULTURAL ANTI  FUNGI

The key difference between copper hydroxide and copper oxychloride is that copper hydroxide is an inorganic compound, while copper oxychloride is an organic compound.

Both copper hydroxide and copper oxychloride are important as fungicides. Copper oxychloride is useful mainly as a fungicide while copper hydroxide is an alternative for fungicides. Copper hydroxide is also used in the production of rayon, a cellulose fibre. Moreover, copper hydroxide is a bluish-green solid while copper oxychloride is a green crystalline solid.

 

https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-copper-hydroxide-and-copper-oxychloride/
.

Copper Sulphide Ores + Sulphuric acid = Copper Sulphate.
Copper Sulphate + Sodium Hydroixde = Copper Hydroxide salts.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>