RE:RE:RE:HelloGolf wrote: "No, its worse than that. IMO, we DO have the solution to saving millions from death and suffering according to the top medical journal in the world, Cell, and this god-send is being squandered by either epic incompetence or mega-blockbuster sabotage. Those are the only two possibilities in my opinion. Either way, we need new and effective leadership. "
in my mind, it's 100% pure incompetence. Epic, pure, unadulterated. The RVX management team owns this disaster, 100%. Mis-managed timelines doesn't even do it justice. To say mid-managed would imply managed. we're flying by the seat of our panties (which are in such a bunch i can taste 'em). the "30 days" wrap up, "walking out in 48 hours", "by the end of the year". we haven't even come CLOSE to ANYTHING stated in 2 years! not even in the same ball park. I have trouble determining if we're even talking about the same subject matter, we're that far off!!!
All we have are excuses, which reconciled against management statements are laughable at best. how can you look at yourselves? even the last presentation:,
Aug 2 update viewed a whopping 335 times! and 3 of those are from me!! I whole heartedly agree Golf, time for new management!!!! i just want to punch the monopoly man in the mouth, all the lies he spews, i'm not even really intersted in listening to him any longer. he 100% has lost all credibility with me, and it souds like with most of you too!
epic sabotage? is that even a possibility? I'm not even sure it's possible to sabotage BOMv2 and COVID. how is that possible? sabotage in terms of raising money? I could see BP sabotaging our SP directly, buying and selling us at a whim, but why? who knows how they treat their cash reserves? BP has BILLIONS, and i'm sure it's not all tied up in long term or illiquid investments. Is someone day trading and stomping us down? Refusing to let DM and co into the Billionaire-club? Possible, non-zero chance? IF they're hammering us down, why? to make a deal? a deal that DM wont take? so we're at a stalemate? its in BP best interests to keep this pill off the market, both for COVID AND cardio/diabetes. Keeping us off the market for COVID makes sense as it's BILLIONS of revenue dolla-dolla-bills. maybe its just a continuation of things.... the shytti status-quo....
All things point to incompetence. Here's another example:
WHO-led trial to study three anti-inflammatory drugs for COVID-19 patients i'll insert some bolding to highlight:
"ZURICH (Reuters) -The World Health Organization (WHO) said on Wednesday a clinical trial in 52 countries would study
three anti-inflammatory drugs as potential treatments for COVID-19 patients.
"These therapies - artesunate, imatinib and infliximab – were selected by an independent expert panel for their potential in reducing the risk of death in hospitalised COVID-19 patients," it said in a statement on the Solidarity PLUS trial."
me again: AN EXPERT PANEL!??!!?! wowie, good for u!!! how many experts? where's the summary? did you publish? did u publish in something better than CELL? what factos did they look at? a whole panel, made up of "experts", and they choose 3 anti-inflammatories? Do we not have anti-inflammatory properties? What about our "expert" list last year, where we were #2 on the list? Is that a different list? DM's words, not mine! #2. on a list, from "experts". Now, we have some more "experts" and they're recommending 3 drugs, (2 of which are intraveneous, now THAT's convenient!). Do ur "experts" have anything to go by, like a looooong publication in Cell, peer reviewed? Do ur "experts" have anything to say about why they're choosing these other 3 drugs over ditry ole RVX-208? were those 3 drugs on our same list where we were #2? Did we talk to the WHO? Was our list garbage, such cr@p that WHO decided 3 others were better, including 2 which are intravenous? Are our "experts" garbage compared to these "experts"? Do we even know what we're talkin about any more? maybe i'll make a list, publish it, and now i have a list from an expert (ME!!!!), and there's only 1 drug on there!
Doesn't really matter does it? now they're off to a 52 COUNTRY clinical trial. that's not a typo. FIFTY TWO countries. we can't even get going in OUR HOME COUNTRY! or brazil. does our WONDERFUL CRO, with their overwhelming experience running 20 trials, have anything to say about this? gawd i'd LOVE to know what CRO we're using! bunch of putzes. Are they still tinkering w/ the trial design, which "doesn't cause delays" , "well, maybe a couple of weeks" (DM words, not mine),
im under the impression we're going to 2 trials, 1 in canada, the 2nd is now NEXT YEAR!?! in the US of A. people keep pointing to the clinicaltrials.gov site and asking questions about the CANADA trial, which i'm wondering why? clinicaltrials.gov site has NOTHING to do with the CANADA trial.... i guess that doesn't matter any more, as the US trial is NEXT YEAR!
11 months later, do we have the saudi money DM?
Do we still have money to do a "fast, cheap trial" (DM words, not mine).
if COVID in US is NEXT YEAR, why were you telling us it would be "shortly after" the canada one?
If the US trial for COVID is NEXT YEAR, how much longer does it kick out BOM v 10? we're jusy shy of 2, TWO FREAKING YEARS removed from BOM v1 FAIL. 2. years. TWO. YEARS.
DM looked and sounded so uncomfortable with saying patients in a "few weeks" in the Aug2 youtube vid. i an willing to bet big $: October or LATER for any start. when DM says "mumble mumble mumble a few weeks mumble...." you can TAKE IT TO THE BANK - we're not even close! it was such an easy opportunity to give us a good timeline and he wiffed.....
the general gets madder and madder.... recall a couple weeks back i said 68c....looks like we blew thru the 60's... next stop: WELL into the 50's, i'd say mid-50's or lower, by end of next week. We're touchin .61 a couple times, so the 50's might come sooner than i think....
if we don't have anything, why do we have BTD? DM - i'm tired of you flappin yer gums about BTD like we just got it. u been sitting on this for how long now, u fool? if BTD means something: FREAKIN SHOW ME.