RE:RE:RE:cyberman - have you read this? What portion is completed?thanks for the reply bdog, i hear you but i see things a little differently,
the previous claim stakers and land holder(s) want their share that's the way it's always been, and not always to their benefit, in this case they didn't let their claims expire for a reason, they put in the work and had faith, then along comes Canstar and they hammer out a deal.
sure it's complicated but it is binding, it's theirs as long as Canstar meets the reqiurements, that's the ticket, then along comes ES and company, he sees the same "fault" i see when i was looking to compliment my small NFG holding, and determines the potential reward is worth the risk, yes ES is spreading his money around, i'd like to also but i have to be more selective, although i am considering a couple others (smiley face), i know i am not too late in getting on the bandwagon as it's still early, i believe we are in a good "spot" LOL.
(following along now and can appreciate you guys' humourous banter).
best.
braindeadoldguy wrote: If there is one thing I hate, it's when you can read something and not ever understand it all. Then you have to wonder why it has to be so complicated. Everybody wants their pocket book looked after, but the one doing the digging is taking all the risk, and that is all the shareholder, insiders or not. The company is on the hook to perform and pay, and I hate that kind of arrangement, which is one sided in my opinion.
Cheers