RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:obviouscanyousayiii wrote: There is so much that can be said about this Overboard guy, but I will narrow it to either he is paid to or simply takes pleasure in insulting our intelligence to detract from good discussions or the best way for him to make money is to sue the primary education system for failing him. Whydunnit, I think breaking it down with such a clear example may not do it. Maybe do an illustration with marbles or something.
Whydunnit wrote: overroad wrote:
only a swing trader or an idiot would be mad that they didnt get in at 1 instead of 3 when the price is 20....only amateurs play that game. and here i thought you were edumicated.
If someone spends $30,000 at $3 per share, he gets 10,000 shares. At $1 it's 30,000 shares.
10,000 x $20 = $200,000.
30,000 x $20 = $600,000.
Seems to me that $400,000 difference would matter to more than just idiots. In fact I'd say the only people it wouldn't matter to are idiots.
yes, ill get the marble analogy. i bought some marbles for 3 bucks. you show up with a bunch of marbles you borrowed from the other school and oversaturate our playground with marbles making them super cheap. i buy a bit of your marbles you sold for $1(thanks). now you have to pay back the other playground their marbles. but me and the other kids stopped selling ours back because we like our marbles and want to keep them. ive still got my marbles, seems you have lost yours. moral of the story: economists have no balls, they have to borrow them from other ppl.