RE:RE:RE:RE:Technicals....back to 13 cents and likely 12.5Investor10X wrote: Why won't you provide evidence of your position if you we're really here to help us? Why would you keep us in the dark? I'm giving you a chance to convince me. In fact, you're getting a chance to convince all of us. And this isn't about the technicals, I don't disagree with you there, I want to know why this is a bad investment because my due diligence tells me this is a good investment.
He can't and does not want to provide any evidence for this being a bad company, because all he cares about is day to day price movement, not fundamentals and long term prospect. I tried to argue reasonable with 88 in the past and every argument i made was usually countered with "but the stock goes down, so it must be a bad company" or "you are working for the FCO pump department" and that was about as far as a technical discussion about the fundamentals went.
He is a pennyflipper, even admitted that flat out in the past, who only cares about daily price movement to make a quick buck. 88 does not understand a single technical thing about mining. He does not understand the significance of discovery of a hydrothermal gold deposit in an area where FCO is and how much of a rare and important discovery that is and that they are currently out there trying to further proof that and find the source. There is a reason why there neighbours, Grupo Mxico, not exactly a small company contacted them and agreed to sign a CA.
But none of this matters, because the "best" counter argument you or i or anyone else will ever get from him is "the stock isn't going up, so you are clearly wrong". It is frustrating to say the least but at this point i decided to only troll him back, because there really isn't any point spinning in circles.