ROUND 2 ( xrf ) to answer ceo.ca poster BH should be utilizing thier time in a fashion of,
scoping thier soils and all ores for added minerals - while waiting for...
- permitting
- electrical station installment
- enviro and chemical assistence 3rd parties
This bull river deposit - in my opinion - has not really been characterized.
It appaears to be sedimentry, but on the flip side, it could also be- porphyry.
Theres no definitive diagrams on BH's website that depict the parameters of the entires claims owned - i willassume they adopted all claims from Gallowai but - to my understanding BH also added a few other expansion claims - where ?
Hence - an ipdate map would do wonders with the identifiers of, former named claims inwhich one can navigate the claims holdings.
As mentioned so many times,
accomplishing a 93% extraction recovery sounds al lwonderful, yet, why ink a contract with ocean ( prematurely ) before fully understanding the ore characterization inwhich might host
severa lother valuable minerals - i'd hate to see 75% waste ores sold along side of a 25% concentrate that might place the junior in a position of several minerals lost in the 75% waste resulting in, lost profits.
1995 drill diagrams present the case for,
geothermal copper indusion.
Yet, if we fastforward we can see the bul ldepoait is moreso lateral in nature.
The smoking gun - the latest diagrams showing the lateral nature of bul lriver deposit has several colorations depicting the ore body but with no grades for each of the colorations.
Which places the investors at a disadvantage on not knowing how the depposit was formed - and the biggest clue to know ing is the coloration grades - low and high grade dispersments would assist with the formation of how the deposit was formed.
Sediments come up quite often in tech reports.
Shales, and argilites, and greywacke, are most often comprised of clays.
Throw in the soil tests just north of bull and well, there's lots of other minerals at surface
that lend the notion of, sometihng else is going on in this district. Especially in the heart of a very large basin that was perhaps a far larger river system.
SOIL TEST DATA
https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.bht/braveheart-resources-inc?postid=33716376
Considering other nearby claims on BH lands - begins to paint the picture of, much larger story in which was never compounded on by Braveheart - i feel the present junior simply slipped insided of Gallowai's old shoes and with same format - wants to produce a - concentrate ore - which doesn't really profit the junoior nor shareholde. One only needs to
tally what it would cost to produce a concentrate vs what a 25% con fetches to know what i'm meaning. Pays the wages and pulls the minerals but... what about proping the share price?
All eyes should be staring at the - undisclosed contract - wondering what the price per 25% concentrate was arrived at.
CONSIDER OTHER NEARBY SHOWINGS
Severa ldrills were not incorporated with in the current core mineral body due to unlocateable collars.
Yet, if one sifts the historical data, severa l nearby adits and drills paint a picture of there's more to these lands.
Take a moment and read about the discovery on other nearby showings -
https://stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.bht/braveheart-resources-inc?postid=33690226
I'm seeing very large porphyry system nearby.
Copper pops up nearby. - G zone + Ole Abe.
Enormous dyke widths on Copper King.
And Fledspar showing. appears to have been labelled a porphyry ssyste, with incredible
depths - showcasing a monzanite with - again - potential REE's.
.
Former analysis of cores but, no follow up by current junior - these findings should have been investigated and reinterpretated prior to an Ocena contract. One has to forthink - in terms of,
what ifd this bul lruver system is not nessisarily an underground mine - but rather - open pit -
which is why i have stressed so often to check the outside ores outside of the veining.
It would tel lthe entire stroy and the what if the mine was a potential candidate for open pitting ?' Far larger ore tonnage comes int oplay with the potential of several other minerals .
COBALTITE comes to mind...wink.
With all of Bravehearts staff on the books, this project is being run as a one man band with outside assistence of 3rd parties - not my idea format - not to mention - the belated timelines that has now pushed this project into a Q-1 2022. Not exactly what a shareholder wants ot hear when the markets as a whole are teetering. Throw in premature concentrate contract and it's a headshaker.
Bringing forth that university finding for ( feldspar showing ) and truly working on the cobaltite with in the bul lmine would do wonders to this stock not to mention switching up the extraction to accomodate other potential minerals.
Now, having said al lthe above, segways - how to adress the ceo.ca poster who counters XRF.
Once one establishes al lof the above and gains their bearings - it's then, one should consider what an XRF would or could do to address the other potential minerlas with in soils, bull mine itself with ores outside veining and all other showings near the bul lriver mine.
If the junior was to perofrm all these tests - and if only permitted to patially recognize the potential or existence of other minerals it would completely change the dynamics of this project in 5 ways -
1) OTHER MINERAL POTENTIAL
2) FORMAT OF MINE MODEL - COULD CHANGE TO OPEN PIT
3) CURRENT CONTRACT WAS TOO PREMATURE
4) CURRENT EXTRACTION SHOULD BE SWITCHED UP
5) BRINGS FAR MORE VALUE TO JUNIOR AND SHAREHOLDER
THAT'S MY ANSWER - TABULATOR.
It's not as easy to answer a question about XRF without factoring all the above.
In fact i would reccommend ( Ian ) to take a few hours and confer with,
Mark Saxon of Medallion Resources.
Out of Vancouver.
dEALS IN ree's and extraction o ree's.
Monzanite.
GOOD READ -
https://ca.paidpromotionalmessages.com/companies/news/943524/medallion-resources-making-great-strides-with-proprietary-process-to-extract-rare-earths-from-mineral-sand-monazite-943524.html
https://medallionresources.com/
Most all copper juniors out of B.C. work a 21% - 28% copper concentrate.
One has to ask.. .if some of these copper concentrates are porphyry systems and the what if several ree's are present in thier waste ores that are shipped with the conncentrate ?
Hence - smaller richer copper deposit like bul lriver - should have a second assesment to make sure the junior is not giving away its profits in waste ores.
Just my own opinion.
Wango~