RE:RGratsnake220 wrote: Too me it doesnt matter who sells or who buys at this time......RG is so overqualified to be in charge of the group of urangatangs who proceeded hm.....Corporations like IBM package out their CEO s at 60 years of age as a rule....So after Lexmark RG saw a investment opportunity that he believed he could turn around.....And securing patents are a result of R &D conclussions.....They do not put money on the table...But it is a signal that the con artists are not running the show......I do wonder how long he stays.....Does he need the job....no....Does he still want the job? Is this going the way of most micro venture plays.....do the PP to piece off the Board, spam lots of letters and reports to cover up for fact that the place is broke.....If RG was 40 i would not bring up the age thing.....But its what we have ....in 2015 a pp was done....and yest the board was pieced off and the story was overssubscribed and millions of warrants flooded the market......just questions.....
Why would someone try to link a six year old action of a company at the time being operated by the D brothers when he knows full well they have been effectively exited? Perhaps he can log in as one of his other aliases and ask the old owners? I wonder what insight they have to the companies direction now? None? It's really a delight that he stays on the board to provide such depth and insight. Why does he speak like it's his company? "It's all WE have left"? Who is we? Damn? WED? Mississauga? ...just questions....