RE:RE:RE:I said IF defendants lawyers want to prevent pl Hey Gunner, why not tell us what you know? I think Ed is in lawsuit. He probably knows a bit. You seem to be so interested here since the black mamba attack and still here well after the recap. You don't think a lawsuit has merit? What do you know about thomvest? They have shut down every indication in Fez and now suggest on transcript that they have to do preclinical work on next fez indication before moving anything forward. How many years will they delay before they finally bury fez and sell it privately. Thomson is pretty sneaky, eh? The muppets of CEO and President are getting into dangerous territory.
GunnerG wrote: OMG, shut up. Ed hasn't a clue whats going on.
stockman6767 wrote: "I said IF defendants lawyers want to prevent pl
Then it's clear they don't want truth to come out. What reason would they not let p laurin answer questions under oath as representative of company"
Edrose, you are not making sense! If by "IF" you mean you do not know and are speculating, on what basis do you come to think that the defendant's lawyers are preventing P. Laurin from testifying? Your assertion makes no sense! Are you claiming you know something that tells you that PL is being prevented from testifying? What exactly do you mean?? What makes you think he won't testify?