FWIHaving said all that was contained within my last most recent post, allow me to ask what in sam hell is GRA managment waiting for to provide an update on precisely what stage of development the VoltaXplore jointly owned venture is at, i.e. should it be developed at all since the last news release claiming such a partnership had been formed?
The CEO certainly likes to brag about the cost effectiveness vs.spherical graphene. He suggests NanoXplore's process for producing EV battery cell anodes incorporating silicon onto or within a graphite based anode material, is much more cost efficient than (cheaper than) the spherical graphene process which other Quebec based companies are relying on and touting as the most cost efficient process for incorporating silicon within or onto a graphite based anode material.
Has NanoXplore's CEO been simply talking out of his anus; or, does he actually have the intention to prove his assertion by way of the long touted and not as yet materialized VoltaXplore enterprise client contract.
I refer to a certain world renown company which is clearly advertised as potentially providing VoltaXplore a very lucrative and product affirming contract. A contract which would allow for additional support which would have VoltaXplore being a go to producer of proprietary battery cell anode materials, battery components and complete batteries for battery cell industry manufacturers and automotive manufacturers as well.
Part of the primary reasoning as to why I provided the forestated commentary and posed my question in the specific way I chose to do so, is as follows.
Currently, representatives for a Battery Materials company based in Vancouver, B.C. Canada have certainly been 'busy as bees' signing non disclosure agreements or NDA's with some of the world's largest and most profitable battery cell and complete EV battery manufacturers, as well as a certain electric automotive manufacturer in particular.
Such NDA signatories are said to be individually and collectively interested in testing and thereby confirming the 'commercial viability' of battery cells manufactured utilizing a 'proprietary', one pot, comparatively extremely low cost and mass scale industrial process for integrating silicon upon graphite or silicon upon other anode and/or cathode materials, within battery cells.
The company I refer to boasts a management team comprised of former LG Chem and former Samsung SDI representatives, professionals who posess enviable skills, education and accompanying experience; and has fashioned and maintains a 'fundemental' relationship with Yonsei University-Industry Foundation ("YUIF") in South Korea.
The company I refer to also boasts the proprietary technology required to enable a would be industry leading 5 minute superfast EV battery charging cycle.
I can go on all day speaking about what the referred to company's management has claimed it's proprietary technologies are capable of providing to EV battery manufacturers and for the global electric automotive industry participants and consumers at large; I won't.
Sufficed to ask, what exactly is delaying that which is supposed to be one of the primary drivers and massive revenue generators for the stakeholders vested of the VoltaXplore enterprise, NanoXplore being just one of the vested stakeholders?
You would think that Martinrea International Inc representatives would be striking while the iron is hot, so to speak?