RE:RE:RE:RE:converting dataDo you think occurred to anybody to report results consistently across the full time frame, such as the 3 patients from Ph1b...including them in all short, long and very long term results? Duh!
2b7f6fab wrote: Update to my previous comments below. 180 day column and beyond using 20% which only computes with 15 patients. (20%*12=2.4 patients doesn't work) So the 90 day column appears to only count 12 patients and all columns beyond that 15 patients.
Therefore adding 2 complete responses and 1 nr to the 90 day column =
6 complete response
1 partial
2 nr
6 pending
Looking at the 180 day column 20% CR is 3 patients out of 15. Yet 2 of those should have come from Ph1b. And we know that those 2 from Ph1b aren't respresented in columns 270 days and beyond. Have to wait for clarification from the team in Toronto before drawing any conclusions.
2b7f6fab wrote:
For the Optimized Study Chart the 90 day column appears to consider only 12 patients since there are 8.3% used in this column which would translate to 1/.083333 =12 patients.
There is no telling how many are used in the 180 day column, could be 12 or 15.
Jump over to 270 day column which has 6.7% is indicating 15 patients. 1/.0666667 = 15 patients. The 360 day and the 450 day isn't showing the 2 of 3 complete response from Ph1b.
Shrugs shoulders.