RE:RE:Why Define "better". Losing ex-VP of technology? Losing the people behind Blade Optics, the compact binocular which NASA and SpaceX would have been interested in? Seeing 40% of the company shares sold by a significant shareholder? Left with 600k cash for operations? Not enough even to buy a condo here in Toronto. And no revenue commited by partners? If that is what you call "better", I can't imagine what "bad" and "worse" would be...
Quatro wrote: birch1. Agreed. doesnt matter what happens, they bit*h and whine. Im sure Damn1212 will be here shortly bashing and slandering as always. I see his buddies Galvatronx, and CaptainCook are already here. The better things get, the more the bashers show up.