RE:RE:RE:Another questionThere's that doubling down again.....performance is based on just that.....and all the contributing factors not just management......it also includes the actions or inactions of the BoD.....how their vision is being realized.....are they following their strategic plan.....are they making money.....are they progressing with product development........and it goes on an on......
DavidRosenberg wrote: Mil_Man54 wrote: Oh you pumpers.....always trying to accuse us of something we didn't say.......you'd be a fool not to be suspicious of ANY deal that comes out of FSD these days......remember all that money you lost and your family is on your back about it (according to you).......but you seem to think it's the best thing ever despite your family losing hundreds of thousands of dollars......that is just poor judgemnt on your part......you can be hopeful all you want but you need to temper that with some realism which includes past performance......that advice was free.....
DavidRosenberg wrote:
Why don't you guys support the LUCID deal? Is it not in your best intrest to see the company grow?
makes me curious oh yeah i remember bash bash bash bash shortseller quack
Performance is based on what? Who management is , RB was management in 2019 , Thomas fairfull in 2018?
At least AD is not giving up and is sincere in my opinion in wanting to restore FSD Pharma
Hope the Lucid deal works out otherwise back to square 1. I can't support a company if there is no merit
Step by step, first i want to see lucid close that's the main catalyst for me
second i want to see results from $ELYM if its positive or negative for the PEA drug
Cheers