RE:RE:Clarus Reportthomsoni wrote: The report doesn't comment how these relatively skinny zones correlate hole to hole. Good grades.are a good thing..how they corallate between holes...influences.tonnage estimates. Secondly...would like an estimate of formation stike and dip. You need this to correct measured depth intersections.to true stratigraphic thickness...on which tonnage estimates are based.
The Clarus report represents quite well the present case for EMO based on the data. It is a fair summary.
To dive into the data you should read Doc Jones on the EMO page at ceo.ca where he maintains an active presence.. Click on the 'community wiki' header on the left side of that EMO page. You will find there answers to your rather vague insinuations of 'relatively skinny zones' and others which i have highlighted.
I particularly liked 'measured depth intersections to true stratigraphic thickness'. You'd almost think you knew what you were talking about.
Cheers.