RE:RE:RE:What? I expected to see comments I think you spun that little narrative out of your own frustration. Many of the long term holders know this is the doldrums of summer and the ol addage "sell in may and walk away" rings very true in this sector. The volume is very indicative of who's trading the stock. When 80% of the companies charts move entierly in tandem with one another, you know for certainty that its algo trades taking place and simply computers shuffling positions, on a day that they stop, volume is almost 1/10th of the average, thats the real people trading, not based on a single company headline that moves the sector.
The industry is so new that its exposure to giant funds is very limited, hence the volatility. As that exposure gains and as companies start to gain efficiencies and synergies through M&A and organic growth, then you'll see these massive swings settle, and a more normalized trading return. Until then fundamentals and common sence are all but out the window. Aurora could post bad earnings and lose market share (which should be a good thing for everyone else in the sector) yet the entire sector dips because of it... That is not normal.
This has more to due with the season and less to do with your crush me thinks.
sthinei wrote: Actually I think most of the long term holders asking themselves why the hell did I invest in this weak company in a weak sector. Many of the other long term holders or posters have disappeared. Those who bought at recent lows have a good chance of a decent return but you have to rely more on historical trading patterns instead of any hyperbole that proceeds out of Benic's mouth.