Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Theratechnologies Inc T.TH

Alternate Symbol(s):  THTX

Theratechnologies Inc. is a Canada-based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of therapies addressing unmet medical needs. It markets prescription products for people with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) in the United States. The Company's research pipeline focuses on specialized therapies addressing unmet medical needs in HIV, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and oncology. Its medicines include Trogarzo and EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection). Trogarzo (ibalizumab-uiyk) injection is a long-acting monoclonal antibody which binds to domain 2 of the CD4 T cell receptors. EGRIFTA SV (tesamorelin for injection) is approved in the United States for the reduction of excess abdominal fat in people with HIV who have lipodystrophy. Its portfolio includes Phase I clinical trial of sudocetaxel zendusortide (TH1902), a novel peptide-drug conjugate (PDC), in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.


TSX:TH - Post by User

Comment by SPCEO1on Sep 27, 2021 1:52pm
105 Views
Post# 33924739

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sobering statistics in oncology trials

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sobering statistics in oncology trialsYou can always hope that is the case!

palinc2000 wrote: With regards to oncology not necessarily waiting for all conclusions to be proven but waiting for some data ,,,maybe going as far as any data ,,,,
BTW should I conclude that you have added to your position ahead of results from oncology?

palinc2000 wrote: The more than hope stems from Tesamorelin already established undeniable  safety record , known phase 2 clinical trial results ,approved Protocol for Phase 3 from both FDA and  EMA ,failures from other Nash involved companies,KOL s strong endorsement, unmet medical needs and the hundreds of articles posted mainly by Scarlett on Nash ,,,,and finally Paul going on record that he is searching for a partner and the fact that he alluded to getting funds thru other means is just a negotiation tactics imo,,,,,,ALL add up to an opportunity that Partners cant or wont pass up.....

SPCEO1 wrote: That is the problem with investing - if you wait until your conclusions are proven, there usually is no opportunity left to make a profit as others who were willing to make a bet on their analysis of a situation got those profits, and yes, sometimes losses too.

I am curious what the "more than hope" is that you have on a NASH partnership? I am only seeing evidence of a company looking for an alternative to a partnership.

palinc2000 wrote: You are drawing unproven conclusion imo...Setting yourself up for big disappoinment....
I have very minimal expectations for oncology and greater  expectations for Nah,,
This explains why I dont lose any sleep on the current SP which as you point out in your weekly report card has had nice% appreciation in the   last year,,

I still believe that increased revenues from the legacy drugs will provide as least as  good price appreciation in the next year but probably much better  .Nash partnering on not too bad terms is another possibility  based on more than hope






SPCEO1 wrote: I suspect the fact the trial appears to be still ongoing mitigates the risk of problems related to the overaccumulation in healthy cells expressing sortilin. We are probably in the clear on that risk.

jeffm34 wrote:

it has a couple things going for it which will increase the odds of success greatly.  They are using Docetaxel which already works and is approved.  It doesn't even have to be more effective than Docetaxel alone. If it's only just as effective but at a lower dose meaning less side effects then it will still be approved. The only wild card is over accumulation in healthy cells expressing sortilin. 


 

palinc2000 wrote: Very low [3.8%] success rate.....I fail to see any known hard facts in our  own Phase 1 apart that it is still ongoing and dosing levels have increased but to unknown levels.What dont I get? Would love to get excited but I see nothing except hope

https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/06/11/clinical-trial-success-rates-phase-and-therapeutic-area-14845

 

 


 

 

 

 




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>