RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Calling a special meeting I am as strongly against the moth-balling of the NASH program as I am against them making a terrible decision. Giving the future of that program is contingent on ongoing processes and future milestones that nobody can predict it just makes zero sense to tie down management at this point.
Basically this comes down to whether you think management (and the board) have the best interest of the company. Whether you back management to manage. You basically want to leash management, I don't think the response from them will be all that positive.
jeffm34 wrote:
I can't speak for the major shareholders. My own personal views are that the NASH program should not proceed without a partner, no matter how creative they get in raising funds to do so. If there is a decent chance of success, other companies will be more than willing to validate the program by putting up their own cash. If no one steps forward it would be irresponsible of management to continue given no other company deems the program worthwhile.
palinc2000 wrote:
What would you want to make
Clear?
jeffm34 wrote:
I think given their track record there is cause for concern. If I were a major shareholder, I would want to make my views very clear to management at this point.
palinc2000 wrote:
I respectfully disagree 100%....Waste of time and energy and money