Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. T.KGI


Primary Symbol: T.KL

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd is a Canada-based gold mining, development, and exploration company with a diversified portfolio of exploration projects. The production profile of the company includes the Macassa mine complex located in northeastern Ontario and the Fosterville gold mine located in the State of Victoria, Australia. Also, the company owns the Holt mine and the Detour mine. The company's mines and material mineral projects are located in Canada and Australia.


TSX:KL - Post by User

Comment by westcoast2019on Sep 28, 2021 10:16pm
377 Views
Post# 33935242

RE:Only $450 million break fee

RE:Only $450 million break fee
templetooth2 wrote:
That works out to only $1.70 per share.

The parties are being overly generous in setting such a low hurdle!  I'm sure all you holders who think this is worth north of 60 will be vindicated within hours as every other miner on the planet lines up to outbid these Agnico Amateurs.


With AEM not holding any current Australian properties as far as I know. Newcrest could indeed go joint venture with Barrick especially (scince Barrick expressed interest in growing in Canada) .

The current offer values KL close to $11B US.

 

I think the wheeling and dealing is along ways from over.

Fosterville would be a jewel for Newcrest to complement its current operations, a joint offer at say $12.5B US to $15B US with Newcrest then taking up the Australian assets makes far more sense.

I will definitely be voting no unless we get a better offer than this.

I think it should be going close to $75 CAD not close to $50 CAD.

At $15B US valuation that approaches a CAD price nearing $70.

The top 6 institutional owners have about 25% of the outstanding shares I'd be surprised if they went along with this deal . If they had wanted AEM shares they could have bought them instead for close to the same price. What are the advantages that AEM brings that would cause the combined company to get a bigger valuation ? Other than size I see little . KL already has plenty of capital to fund expansion and operates at a considerably lower AISC than AEM.

Failing a counter offer.

The big question really is can the KL actually convince enough people to accept this deal.I hope that is unlikely.

Barrick Newmont, and Newcrest and maybe others are probably salivating at the thought of acquiring KL now and thanking KL/AEM boards for starting the bidding so low.



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>