Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia, which is host to the Goldstorm Deposit, a large gold-copper porphyry system, as well as several other mineralized zones. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,913 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Comment by rockport1on Oct 01, 2021 4:53pm
278 Views
Post# 33954031

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Everything is lining up

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Everything is lining up

Gentlemen, if memory serves, the NSR(s) in question should not apply/affect TUO at all.  It was not actually drawn up as 1.02% & 0.51% on the entire property.  It was actually 2% (& 1.0%) on AMK's 51% of the Treaty Creek property. So while the math is the same when applied to the entire depsosit: i.e. 2% x 0.51 = 1.02% for example.  The NSR is paid from AMK's portion of the ownership.  

AMK would have to deduct 2% from their 51% portion. Teuton would be unaffected. Once the deal was struck with Tudor, Tudor assumed AMK's proportional responsibilities. Teuton is again unaffected. I.e. the third party NSR is not deducted from Teuton's 20% ownership position, only from AMK's 20% and 31% of Tudors ownership.

However, Teuton's own 0.98%/0.49% NSR does apply to the entire property. 

I could be wrong, only going from memory here. Anyone can look back at the MDAs and Sedar documents. However, I do caution that much of the material even in the most recent MDAs are historical, and superseded by newer agreements. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>