RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New Target $10.00JimmyBly1 stated, "Do you really think it is a healthy sign to pile up and increase inventory account? Up to the ceiling probably?
ANSWER: Without a doubt, yes I do think it is very healthy and quite wise to prepare for the 'contracted' uptake of all the Graphen Black which has been secured by NanoXplore's existing clients.
Would you have the company not be well prepared for the volumes of Graphene BlackTM which existing and 'additional customers' throughout the entire U.S and abroad would be attempting to secure; this, before such customers could be ready to change the very composition of customized 'materials' which are to be supplied to them by Techmer and/or any other Graphene BlackTM utilizing producers of 'composition enhancing products'? These would be requisite Graphene BlackTM enhanced and customized polymer containing formulations utilized in the production of everything from 'lightweighted' and structurally more strong automotive industry 'components' to shampoo bottles, food containers, plastic packaging and everything inbetween.
Increased repetitive 'RECYCLABILITY' is precisely what is driving the overwhelming majority of Techmer's clientele to drop carbon black and rightfully include Graphene Black TM as necessarily comprising the customized polymer formulations employed by Techmer in supplying pelletized products to be utilized by Techmer's various customers in the manufacturing of an untold number of products.
You went on to state, "I ran plants and inventories were managed with great care. If the plant is running and making graphene, it needs to go out. WTF?"
RESPONSE: I'll respond with a question for you BillyBly1.
What would be the quickest way to immediately violate a earlier contracted supply agreement or agreements; agreements signed on behalf of a customer ordering the very 'inventory' which the very 'plants' you ran existed to produce?
You would suggest that after accepting bonafide and 'bankable' contract orders form Techmer and the other NanoXplore customers, NanoXplore should not be ready to deliver such contracted product in the volumes sought by NanoXplore's Graphene BlackTM customers?
Hmm? Now I can better understand why you 'ran' (past tense) plants and, given your clear suggestion NanoXplore not be prepared to meet exponentially increasing demand from it's increased customer base, more than likely mismanaged requisite inventory levels for your then employer, BillyBly1.
Your customers always determine when your produced and their alloted 'inventory' needs to go out; not you, wingnut.